Author’s note: this is the second section in a chapter on how we find our way around. You can read the first section here.
[Latitude and Longitude - an imaginary net to keep Earth from falling. Images from Michael Richmond. ]
Section 2: Guidelines
Constellations are one way we can get a sense of place among the stars. But they are big - bulky - covering large areas of the sky. Just like you need more than just the correct state to get to your aunt’s house, pointing telescopes at specific objects requires something more precise. So here’s another, more exact way of getting oriented: coordinates. Perhaps this sounds scarier, or at least less interesting than constellations, but coordinates just assign each spot a couple of numbers that tells you its exact location. On earth we call these numbers latitude and longitude, and they show up when you drop a random pin on Google maps.
How do we choose these numbers? Well, they’re defined relative to the spin of the earth: earth spins on an axis that goes through the north and south poles, and the equator is the big circle halfway between them, dividing the earth into a top and bottom half. We also split the world in half vertically (like slicing an onion through it’s hairy head of roots down to it’s pointed tip) - and call the cut the prime meridian on one side of the world, and the international date line on the other (The prime meridian goes through Greenwich, England, because a group of powerful people in 1884 decided it would - I mean, you had to choose somewhere, and apparently 72% of the world used British navigation maps in 1884). This giant slice forms a circle from the north pole down to the south pole and back again.
For some reason folks in ancient Babylon decided that there are 360 degrees in a circle, (and thus 180 degrees in a half circle and 90 degrees in a quarter circle), and traditions, once established, rarely change. So latitude ends up being a number between 0 and 90 that tells you how far north or south of the equator you are (90 degrees South at the south pole, 0 at the equator, and 41.9572 degrees North here by the rackety radiator in the back room at Dollop Coffee Shop in Chicago (just a little less than half way to the north pole from the equator). And longitude is a number between 0 and 180 that tells you how far east or west you are of the prime meridian (87.6498 degrees W here at Dollop, since I know you were wondering).
If you’re struggling to picture it, imagine the earth as the great belly of a round Santa wearing a pin striped suite. Call the vertical stripe going through his buttons 0 degrees, and then count stripes going to your left (west) and right (east). If you could actually fit 360 stripes around the shirt (a bad idea, but let’s face it, imagining Santa in pin stripes is already a bad idea), in Chicago I’d be 88 stripes left of the center.
[The Astronomer’s imaginary coordinate grid. Images from Michael Richmond. ]
Astronomers create a similar grid on the sky. The north star (Polaris) is located directly above the Earth’s north pole. Astronomers call this point the celestial north pole. They similarly take the place in the sky directly above the south pole to be the celestial south pole, and the ring directly above the equator, half way between these celestial poles the celestial equator. With these mappings they are able to define a sort of “celestial latitude and longitude” to locate stars and other objects in the sky. The official names for these are Right Ascension (which is just celestial longitude, abbreviated RA) and Declination (celestial latitude, abbreviated Dec). So now you can impress your friends at parties. Just like Dollop Coffee Uptown is at 41.9572 N, 87.6498 W, the star Betelgeuse (Orion’s armpit - literally translated “armpit of the mighty one”) is at 7.4 degrees N, 88.8 E. This fixed spot on the map relative to all the other stars and objects is really great for pointing telescopes, since it can be as exact as necessary, and doesn’t change throughout the year. It’s fixed at that spot. (Well, mostly… Betelgeuse is technically moving through space. We call this it’s proper motion - its motion relative to the coordinate system. But for the vast majority of astronomical objects, this motion, while it might be really fast in actuality, appears tiny/ indetectable on the sky, since objects are so far away. For example, even though Betegeuse is moving at 67,000 miles per hour, it’s RA changes by 0.000007 degrees per year).
If this whole discussion of getting oriented has you feeling more lost than before, you’re not alone. Thinking about coordinate systems is pretty mind bending. Part of the difficulty, as you’ve probably gathered, is that so much of it seems somewhat arbitrary, like it’s made up. And the issue is, it is. What we are essentially doing is putting down a bunch of curved rulers on the earth, to measure distances relative to some reference spot. But you have to choose a place to measure distances from, and you have to choose how to position the rulers (up, down, tilted at 37 degrees?), and you have to choose what sort of marks you want to put on your ruler (millimeters? inches?). (For the sky we chose Greenwich and the North Pole, tilted to align with the spin of earth’s axis, and degrees).
I read on the internet once that René Descartes first came up with modern coordinate systems watching a fly on his ceiling above his bed, and wondering how to describe its exact location. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet. But do think about pinning that fly down - it’s a helpful mind game. You’d want to pick a reference, say the corner of the room near your head and to the left looking up. You’d need to then define an orientation for your rulers - the directions of the walls, and a way to quantify distances - maybe by comparing to the size of a ceiling tile, or a poster of Santa in his pinstripes.
I find it somewhat telling that we invent invisible lines to tell us where we are. How do you find a galaxy? Use these lines. How do we find ourselves? Well, maybe that’s harder. I find it interesting that being lost is a relative phenomenon - I’d be as lost in your hometown as you’d be in mine. Because really, my life coordinate system is relative to some home. That is, to turkey dinners, and the piano, and laughter, and the one place that fear can take a small leave because someone else was in charge.
As a kid I loved coloring books, and that box of 64 color crayons with that burnt sienna dirt brown and cerulean water blue. I love that cerulean blue. As it would get worn down, you’d have to unpeel a bit of that paper wrapper and sharpen it in that little white plastic hole in the back of the box. I think it broke once in a fight with one of my siblings. I was proud of my ability to stay within the lines, coloring in little circles like my mom, the artist, the painter, taught me. My Mickey and Donald didn’t look quite as nice as the Minny she’d colored, but I was still pretty proud. My sister, young at the time, would scribble all over the page. It’s funny how coloring between the lines is a learned habit. We have to will our brains and fingers like sailors trying to control a docking ship.
You know, my favorite color was pink - any and all pinks: I loved their bright hues and the way they stood out, and surprised. But I was teased about it, and with some indirect encouragement from my mom, I changed it to “red,” a better color for a 90s boy.
As an oldest child, I tended to be a rule follower. Whether or not something was “allowed” colored my feelings about an activity, even when I didn’t want it to. Like eating food on the train: it was great, until I learned it wasn’t allowed. I know it’s not like this for everyone. But we all have our lines. Maybe for some some, disobedience, toeing the line, going outside the line, is freeing. We certainly celebrate the “right kind” of deviance. Fahrenheit 451 starts with a quote from Juan Ramón Jiménez: “If they give you ruled paper, write the other way.” And I mean, how else might we make progress? But if you want to fight the man, even this has rules. Have you ever been on Twitter? And consider, what does it mean to be lost? From Webster’s new world dictionary: “6. Having wandered from the way; uncertain as to one’s location.” Of course, we use the same word for ruined, damned, not winning, wasted. No wonder we are wary of wandering too far from whatever is “the way.”
All this to say, shared invisible lines structure our thinking. They’re how we fit in. And it sure is complicated.
Great chapter Luke! I love your description of how we learn to live within invisible lines, sometimes treating the lines as things in themselves rather than just guides. May I always remember that “enneagram 9” is an invisible line that I can use to describe myself, and not a cause of my behaviors.